Philosophy is an antidote to unclear thinking, and specifically to the ill effects of our mishandling our own ways of making sense of things. Moreover, this aim is to be viewed in therapeutic terms. Its aim is to promote clarity of thought and understanding, not to discover and state truths about the nature of reality. Wittgenstein conceives of philosophy as an activity, rather than a body of doctrine. Among these are his conception of philosophy itself and, relatedly, an apparent recoil from metaphysics. Nevertheless, there are some equally profound and very significant continuities. It is well known that Wittgenstein’s early philosophical work and his later philosophical work are marked by various profound differences of style and content. Read the series' previous articles The Return of Metaphysics: Hegel vs Kant, The Return of Idealism: Hegel vs Russell, Derrida and the trouble with metaphysics, The Return of Metaphysics: Russell and Realism, and After Metaphysics: Rorty and American Pragmatism. #Imy meaning in text series#This is the sixth instalment in our series The Return of Metaphysics, in partnership with the Essentia Foundation. But in his attempt to avoid the pitfalls of traditional metaphysics, Wittgenstein ends up asking questions about the way we make sense of things, that are metaphysical, argues A.W. For him, philosophy’s attempts to answer traditional metaphysical questions like “Is there a God?”, “What is the nature of reality”, “Do we have free will?” end up in confusion and nonsense. Wittgenstein is known as a philosopher who sought to cure philosophy from unclear thinking.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |